...

Exploration of the creative processes in animals, robots, and AI: who holds the authorship?


  • Abbott R (2016) I think, therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law. BCL Rev 57:1079. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andreyev J (2016) The compassion manifesto: an ethics for art+ design and animals. In: Castricano J, Simonsen RR (eds). Critical perspectives on veganism. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series, pp. 155–180

  • Applegate K, Grupper A (2013) The one and only Ivan. Recorded Books, United States of America


    Google Scholar
     

  • Aristotle (1987) De Anima (On the Soul), translated by Hugh Lawson-Tancred, Penguin Classics, London

  • Beardsley MC (1970) The aesthetic point of view. Metaphilosophy 1(1):39–58

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berthaut F, Marshall MT, Subramanian S, Hachet M (2013) Rouages: revealing the mechanisms of digital musical instruments to the audience. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), May 2013, pp. 164–169

  • Berthaut F, Coyle D, Moore J, Limerick H (2015) Liveness through the lens of agency and causality. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), May 2015, pp. 382–386

  • Betzler M ed (2008) Kant’s ethics of virtue. de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bin SA (2018) The show must go wrong: towards an understanding of audience perception of error in digital musical instrument performance. Dissertation, Queen Mary University of London, England

  • Boden MA (2010) The Turing test and artistic creativity. Kybernetes 39(3):409–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011036132

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonnet F, Mills R, Szopek M et al. (2019) Robots mediating interactions between animals for interspecies collective behaviours. Sci Robot 4(28):eaau7897. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aau7897

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blattner CE, Donaldson S, Wilcox R (2020) Animal agency in community. Pol Anim 6(1):1–22


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bloom P (1996) Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cogn 60(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00699-0

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Prentice J (1987) Simian scribbles: a reappraisal of drawing in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 101(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.101.1.82

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bridy A (2012) Coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Stan Tech L Rev 5. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m

  • Buongiorno F (2023) Can algorithms be embodied ? A phenomenological perspective on the relationship between algorithimic thinking and the life-world. Found Sci 28(4):1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09855-z

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burgat F (2015) Improving animals, improving humans: transpositions and comparisons. In: Bateman S, Allouche S, Gayon J, Marzano M, Gofette J (eds). Inquiring into animal enhancement: model or countermodel of human enhancement? Palgrave Macmillan, London, United Kingdom, pp. 34–48

  • The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness (2012) Proceedings of the Francis Crick Memorial Conference, Churchill College, Cambridge University, United-Kingdom

  • Capra O, Berthaut F, Grisoni L (2020) Have a seat on stage: Restoring trust with spectator experience augmentation techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, July 2020, Royal Birmingham Conservatoire, pp. 695–707

  • Capra O (2020) The experience of spectators of digital interactions: Benefits of visual augmentations and the role of attributed agency in electronic music performances. Dissertation, Lille University, France

  • Cayol A, Bévière-Boyer B, Gaillard E (2024) Transanimalisme. L’animal augmenté, entre exploitations et protections. Mare&Martin, Paris


    Google Scholar
     

  • Christie’s (2018) Is artificial intelligence set to become art’s next medium. https://www.christies.com/features/A-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-9332-1.aspx

  • Copeland BJ (2000) The turing test. Mind Mach 10(4):519–539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011285919106

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Corti L (2022) Robot as embodied agent. A phenomenological critique. In: Software engineering and formal methods, SEFM 2022 Collocated Workshops: AI4EA F-IDE CoSim-CPS CIFMA, September 2022, pp. 302–312

  • Davies CR (2011) An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights–Artificial intelligence and intellectual property. Comp Law Secur Rev 27(6):601–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2011.09.006

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dalziell AH, Magrath RD (2012) Fooling the experts: accurate vocal mimicry in the song of the superb lyrebird, Menura novaehollandiae. Anim Behav 83(6):1401–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.009

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeGrazia D (1990) On singer: more argument, less prescriptivism. Behav Brain Sci 13(1):18–18

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Descartes R (1937) Discours de la méthode. La Pléiade, Paris

  • De Waal F (2006) Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Waal F (2016) Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? WW Norton & Company, New-York

  • Diamond J (1986) Animal art: variation in bower decorating style among male bowerbirds Amblyornis inornatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83(9):3042–3046. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.9.3042

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Delfin D (2019) An Artist’s creative process: a model for conscious evolution. In: Lee N (ed.). The transhumanism handbook, Springer Verlag, pp. 587–602

  • Doherty SJ (2019) ART in the age of artificial intelligence. Esse 97:30–41


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dolgin E (2019) Elephants, Dolphins, and Chimps need the Internet, too: a new initiative promotes Internet communication among smart animals. IEEE Spectr 56(09):6–7

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Donaldson S, Kymlicka W (2011) Zoopolis: a political theory of animal rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dorigo M, Théraulaz G, Trianni V (2020) Reflections on the future of swarm robotics. Sci Robot 5(49):eabe4385. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abe4385

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dufour V, Poulin N, Curé C, Sterck EH (2015) Chimpanzee drumming: a spontaneous performance with characteristics of human musical drumming. Sci Rep 5(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11320

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Engels F (2009) Feuerbach-the roots of the socialist philosophy. Forgotten Books, London


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fels S, Gadd A, Mulder A (2002) Mapping transparency through metaphor: towards more expressive musical instruments. Organ Sound 7(2):109–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771802002042

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferrand Lointier M (2022) Le tournant animal dans l’art contemporain (de 1960 à nos jours): approche écoféministe. Dissertation, University Bordeaux 3, France

  • Gabrys J, Pritchard H (2018) Just good enough data and environmental sensing: moving beyond regulatory benchmarks toward citizen action. Int J Spat Data Infr Res 13:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gallup Jr GG, Anderson JR, Shillito DJ (2002) The mirror test. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (eds). The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition, Bradford Books, pp. 325–333

  • Gardner R, Gardner BT (1978) Comparative psychology and language acquisition. In: Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J (eds). Speaking of apes: a critical anthology of two-way communication with man, Springer US, pp. 287–330

  • Geissmann T (2000) Gibbon songs and human music from an evolutionary perspective. In: Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S (eds). The origins of music, The MIT Press, pp. 103–123

  • Griffin DR (2013) Animal minds: beyond cognition to consciousness. University of Chicago Press

  • Guadamuz A (2016) The monkey selfie: copyright lessons for originality in photographs and internet jurisdiction. Internet Policy Rev 5:1. https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.398

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grundmann M (2007) Transhumanist arts. Aesthetics of the future? Parallels to 19th century Dandyism. In: Heil R, Kaminski A, Stippak M, Unger A, Ziegler M (eds). Tensions and convergences: technological and aesthetic transformations of society, Transcript Verlag, pp. 83–92

  • Hart J, Scassellati B (2012) Mirror perspective-taking with a humanoid robot. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 26(1):1990–1996. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8389

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hristov K (2016) Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma. Idea 57:431


    Google Scholar
     

  • Huron D (2008) Sweet anticipation: music and the psychology of expectation. The MIT Press

  • Janik VM (2014) Cetacean vocal learning and communication. Curr Opin Neurobiol 28:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.010

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jasanoff S, Kim SH (2015) Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. The University of Chicago Press

  • Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14(1):S103–S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones R (2019) An interspecies internet? Thinking and acting feminist-animal rights discourse online. for(e)dialogue 3(1):1–20

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kawase H, Okata Y, Ito K (2013) Role of huge geometric circular structures in the reproduction of a marine pufferfish. Sci Rep 3(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02106

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krink T, Vollrath F (1997) Analysing spider web-building behaviour with rule-based simulations and genetic algorithms. J Theor Biol 185(3):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0306

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kugler K, Savage Rumbaugh S (2002) Rhythmic drumming by Kanzi an adult male bonobo (Pan Paniscus) at the language research centre. Am J Primatol 57:62


    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Neindre P, Dunier M, Larrère R, Prunet P (2018) La conscience des animaux, Éditions Quae

  • Levinson J (1979) Defining art historically. Br J Aesthet 19:232–250

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Locke J, Perry J (1975) Of identity and diversity. In: Perry J (ed.). Essay concerning human understanding, Berkeley, University of California Press

  • Loeb J (1918) Forced movements, tropisms, and animal conduct. Philadelphia and London, J. B. Lippincott Company

  • Malebranche N (1997/1674) The search after truth: with elucidations of the search after truth. The Cambridge University Press

  • Malle BF, Knobe J (1997) The folk concept of intentionality. J Exp Soc Psychol 33:101–121

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martinet L, Pelé M (2021) Drawing in nonhuman primates: what we know and what remains to be investigated. J Comp Psychol 135(2):176, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/com0000251

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martinet L, Sueur C, Hirata S, Hosselet J, Matsuzawa T, Pelé M (2021) New indices to characterize drawing behaviour in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Sci Rep 11(1):3860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83043-0

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martinet L, Sueur C, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, Morimura N, Pelé M (2023) Tool assisted task on touchscreen: a case study on drawing behaviour in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Folia Primatol 94(2–3):111–127. https://doi.org/10.1163/14219980-bja10008

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marx K, Engels F (2022) The German ideology. Foreign Languages Press, Paris, /1845


    Google Scholar
     

  • Matsuzawa T (2017) The 40th anniversary of the Ai Project: the commemorative gift is a silk scarf painted by Ai the chimpanzee. Primates 58(2):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-017-0604-0

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCormack J, Gifford T, Hutchings P (2019) Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In: International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, Art and design. Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 35–50

  • McFarland SE, Hediger R (2009) Animals and agency: an interdisciplinary exploration. Brill, Boston

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meyer HG, Klimeck D, Paskarbeit J, Rückert U, Egelhaaf M, Porrmann M, Schneider A (2020) Resource-efficient bio-inspired visual processing on the hexapod walking robot HECTOR. PLoS ONE 15(4):e0230620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230620

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mikalonytė ES, Kneer M (2022) Can artificial intelligence make art ? Folk intuitions as to whether AI-driven robots can be viewed as artists and produce art. ACM Trans Hum-Robot Interact (THRI) 11(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530875

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mujica E (2000) Nazca: lignes et géoglyphes du désert. La Rev du Patrim Mond 15:42–49


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nguyen P (2019) The monkey selfie, artificial intelligence and authorship in copyright: The limits of human rights. Pub Int LJNZ 6:121


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nochlin L (2021/1971) Why have there been no great women artists? Thames&Hudson, London

  • OneGreenPlanet (2020) Elephant artists? Here’s why making an elephant paint is cruel, not cute. https://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/why-making-an-elephant-paint-is-cruel-not-cute/

  • Ostrow M, Dengel C (2022) United States: art and artificial intelligence collide with copyright law. Romano Law Blog. https://www.romanolaw.com/art-and-artificial-intelligence-collide-with-copyright-law/

  • Oyakawa C, Koda H, Sugiura H (2007) Acoustic features contributing to the individuality of wild agile gibbon (Hylobates agilis agilis) songs. Am J Primatol 69(7):777–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20390

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Obradovich N et al. (2019) Machine behaviour. Nature 568(7753):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, July 2005, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 741–750

  • Regad C, Riot C (2019) La Déclaration de Toulon du 29 mars 2019 sur la personnalité juridique de l’animal: pourquoi? quelle potentialité juridique? Démocratie et Justice

  • Rimoldi G, Manzolli J (2016) Enactive framework for design of digital music interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on New Music Concepts-ICNMC, March 2016, Corpus ID: 207815887

  • Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3(2):131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Naudier D, Rollet B (2007) Genre et légitimité culturelle: quelle reconnaissance pour les femmes? Genre et Légitimité Culturelle 1:172


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosati E (2017) The Monkey Selfie case and the concept of authorship: an EU perspective. J Intellect Prop Law Pr 12(12):973–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx199

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salimpoor VN, Zald DH, Zatorre RJ, Dagher A, McIntosh AR (2015) Predictions and the brain: How musical sounds become rewarding. Trends Cogn Sci 19(2):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.001

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sartori L, Bocca G (2023) Minding the gap (s): public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries. AI Soc 38(2):443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sartre G, Zocco F (2019) Attack the Sun [62 min] Nuit Blanche Productions

  • Savage-Rumbaugh S, Wamba K, Wamba P, Wamba N (2007) Welfare of apes in captive environments: comments on, and by, a specific group of apes. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 10(1):7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701277261

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schiller PH (1951) Figural preferences in the drawings of a chimpanzee. J Comp Phys Psychol 44(2):101–111. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0053604

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schloss WA (2003) Using contemporary technology in live performance: The dilemma of the performer. J New Music Res 32(3):239–242

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider A, Paskarbeit J, Schilling M, Schmitz J (2014) HECTOR, a bio-inspired and compliant hexapod robot. In: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems: Third International Conference, Living Machines Proceedings 3, Springer International Publishing, pp. 427–429

  • Schrecker P (1938) Malebranche et le préformisme biologique. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. pp. 77–97

  • Someşan AI (2022) Transhumanism in performance art. J Intercult Manag Ethics 5(4):51–57. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.4.06

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Star Trek: Voyager (2001) Author, Author, Season 7, episode 20. United States

  • Sorgner SL, Deretic I (2015) From humanism to meta-, post- and transhumanism? Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften

  • Sueur C (2011) A non-Lévy random walk in chacma baboons: what does it mean? PLoS ONE 6(1):e16131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016131

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sueur C, Forin-Wiart MA, Pelé M (2020) Are they really trying to save their buddy? The anthropomorphism of animal epimeletic behaviours. Anim 10(12):2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122323

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sueur C, Pelé M (2017) Editorial: Anthropomorphism, between merits and demerits. Lett du CEERE 107:1


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sueur C, Zanaz S, Pelé M (2023) Incorporating animal agency into research design could improve behavioural and neuroscience research. J Comp Psychol 137(2):129–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000335

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sueur C, Huffman MA. Co-cultures: exploring interspecies culture among humans and other animals. Preprint on https://hal.science/hal-04368545/document

  • Tanaka M, Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T (2003) Finger drawing by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 6:245–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0198-3

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Terleph TA, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH (2015) Lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) great call reveals individual caller identity. Am J Primatol 77(7):811–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22406

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tissue S, Wilensky U (2004) Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity. Int Conf Complex Syst 2:16–21


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomasello M, Call J (2004) The role of humans in the cognitive development of apes revisited. Anim Cogn 7:213–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0227-x

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. The Oxford University Press, USA

  • Turner C (2020) The cognitive phenomenology argument for disembodied AI consciousness. In: Gouveia S (ed.). The age of artificial intelligence: an exploration. Vernon Press. pp. 111–132

  • U.S. Copyright Office (2021) Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 101, 3rd edn. U.S. Copyright Office

  • U.S. Copyright Office (2023) Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence, Library of Congress. U.S. Copyright Office

  • Vernier G, Caselles-Dupré H, Fautrel P (2020) Electric dreams of Ukiyo: a series of Japanese artworks created by an artificial intelligence. Patterns 1(2):1–2

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vernier G, Caselles-Dupré H, Fautrel P (2020) Facets of AGI: where science meets spirituality. Patterns 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100026

  • Vita‐More N (2013) Aesthetics: bringing the arts & design into the discussion of transhumanism. In: More M, Vita-More N (eds). The transhumanist reader: classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future, John Wiley and Sons. pp. 18–27

  • Wang GY, Cheng DD, Xia DY, Jiang HH (2023) Swarm intelligence research: From bio-inspired single-population swarm intelligence to human-machine hybrid swarm intelligence. Mach Intell Res 20(1):121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-022-1367-7

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watanabe S (2012) Animal aesthetics from the perspective of comparative cognition. In: Watanabe S, Kuczaj S (eds). Emotions of animals and humans: comparative perspectives. Springer, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 129–162

  • Wise SM (2010) Legal personhood and the nonhuman rights project. Anim L 17:1


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB (2007) When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(7):547–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2152

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Related Articles

    Back to top button

    Adblock Detected

    PLZ DISABLE YOUR ADBLOCK AND REFRESH THE PAGE